The Magazine Interpretive Report, Block 12 Building 9Originally entitled: "Magazine Interpretive Planning Team Proposals"

Anonymous

1986

Colonial Williamsburg Library Research Report Series - 1250
Colonial Williamsburg Foundation Library

Williamsburg, Virginia

1990

MAGAZINE INTERPRETIVE PLANNING TEAM PROPOSALS.
[Blk 12, Bldg 9 & 9A]


January 3, 1986

CONTENTS:

Page 2.Preface.
Page 3.Phase One Proposal.
Intent.
The Physical Property.
Research.
Page 4.Collections.
Page 5.Phase One Interpretation.
Page 9.January 1 to March 31 - French and Indian War Period 1754-1765.
Page 12.April 1 to July 4 - Early Revolutionary War Years 1774-1776.
Page 15.July 5 to September 30 - Mid to Late Revolutionary War Years 1777-1781.
Page 18.October 1 to December 31 - Peacetime 1763-1774.
Page 21.Training.
Page 23.Phase One Cost Estimate.
Phase One Time Schedule.
Program Evaluation.
Page 24.Phase Two.
Page 27.Phase Three.
Page 28.Appendix.
Charter Document.
Jay Gaynor, "Proposal for Research and Subsequent Refurnishing of Magazine."
Patricia Samford, "Archaeological Briefing and Test Plan."
Edward A. Chappell, "Magazine Research Proposal."
Kevin Kelly, "Historical Research Requirements for Reinterpreting the Public Magazine."
N. A. Pappas to E. A. Chappell, "Enclosure for Magazine Area."
Vanessa E. Patrick to Nicholas A. Pappas, "Chevaux-de-frise at the Magazine."
2

PREFACE

The attached proposals of the Magazine Interpretive Planning Team represent the collective work of several individuals within the Foundation. The standing committee has consisted of:

  • Bill White - Chairman
  • John Hill
  • Jeff Geyer
  • Collie Harris
  • Kevin Kelly
  • Jay Gaynor
  • Bill Reldon

Assistance has also been forthcoming from Ed Chappell of Architectural Research, Patricia Samford of Archeology, and Betty Leviner of Collections.

Several assumptions, in addition to the "charter document", have been implicit in the Teams work.

  • (1)The quality of interpretation currently at the Magazine is excellent.
  • (2)The major weakness of the interpretive program is in the available research and documentation of the site, and probable inappropriateness of its furnishings.
  • (3)The Magazine and its collection are extremely important in the Foundation's interpretive plan and should receive the attention and resources of a major exhibition site.
  • (4)Any system providing for the interpretation of the Magazine and Guard House must take into consideration its visitation. The Magazine has become, on an annual basis, the second highest visitation area (1985 Jan. - Aug. = 449, 424 visitors, compared to the Capitol 477, 993 and the Palace = 364, 704) and during the summer, moth-s the number one visited site (August visitation = 99,443 visitors, compared to the Capitol = 86,582 and the Palace = 72,838 visitors).

What is represented in the following report are our recommendations for future interpretive efforts at the Magazine. The proposal is divided into three phases. Phase one represents the interim steps which can be taken with current interpretive information. Phase two, lays out our proposals for the research and development necessary for future interpretive development, and phase three includes the method whereby the inclusion of new research may be accomplished in the interpretive plan.

3

PHASE ONE PROPOSAL.

INTENT.

The Phase One proposal represents only a partial step towards the reinterpretation of the Magazine and Guard House. It treats specifically the problems and situations which can be solved with our current resources. Much in a successful reinterpretation of the complex, however, deals with material which will be developed under Phases Two and Three of this proposal. Phase One represents a stop gap measure, allowing progress in the interpretive plan to begin while interpretive information is being developed.

The Phase One plan is based on methods proven to be effective in interpreting the complex and which we believe will provide a strong foundation for the implementation of new research material. The seasonal approach to interpretation, which is presented in Phase One, is a major step in accomplishing the objectives set out in the Charter Document.

THE PHYSICAL PROPERTY.

The Magazine during the 18th century was a military warehouse. Traditionally, however, it has been utilized interpretively as a museum display of military weapons anti accouterments. It is. the proposal of the Planning Team that this site be returned to its original warehouse appearance. The furnishing of the Magazine would be based on inventories to give a representation of the building between the period 1764 and 1775. The Guard House would be furnished in the appearance of the French and Indian Bar period when civilian guards were employed to protect the Magazine.

RESEARCH.

There is a body of literature currently available which deals with the Magazine and its operation during the 18th-century. This information will need to be reviewed and formed into a usable document prior to the implementation of the interpretive plan. The areas to be addressed are:

  • (1)Biographical information on individuals associated with the Magazine's operation. These individuals include the Armorers, Keepers, and Guards.
  • (2)Documentation which identifies the items listed in various inventories as well as information currently accessible on their manner of storage, types of storage containers, their markings and method of storage in Magazines and armories during the period.

COLLECTIONS.

Several modifications can be made to the collections of the Magazine and Guard House in the near future to work towards the more accurate appearance of the site. The following alterations are suggested:

ARMORER'S SHOP.

  • (1)Replacement of non 18th-century style tools.
  • (2)Replace the shelving with tool racks similar to those shown in the Johan Zoffany portrait of John Cuff (an enlargement of the painting is in the "Patron-Tradesman" exhibit at the Gallery).
  • (3)Remove the iron barrier from the room to allow better access to the space.
  • (4)Reorganize items stored in the room so that they look more like storage than display.

POWDER ROOM.

  • (1)Remove all non-powder related items.

SECOND FLOOR.

  • (1)Sand several of the musket boxes so that they appear new.
  • (2)Acquire a half dozen new barrels of various sizes from the coopers.
  • (3)Fabricate a dozen or so wooden boxes of various sizes similar to those in and in front of Greenhow store.
  • (4)Investigate ways in which the weapons collection can be displayed so as not to be the primary focus of the room. This will include the shifting of the collection away from the head of the staircase.
  • (5)Group more of the musket boxes together and with the addition of new containers, use them to protect original material.
  • (6)The arrangement of all items on the second floor should aid the visitor in focusing on the interpreter in the area.
  • (7)The acquisition of reproductions to supplement the collections. Additions should include blankets, textiles, 4 cartridge boxes, blankets, uniform parts, canteens, and tools.
  • (8)Have a location with reproduction writing equipment and paper as if someone is working in the storeroom noting quantities of goods, condition, etc.
  • (9)Investigate and implement improvements in current lighting system.

THIRD FLOOR.

  • (1)Remove all original arms currently stored there. Remove the lantern.
  • (2)Purchase boxes and barrels to install around the stairway.

GUARD HOUSE.

  • (1)Replace iron utensils with reproductions.
  • (2)Acquire some additional cooking utensils.
  • (3)Set the table as if it were being used (pipes, tobacco box, cards, paper and quills, eating utensils, pewter).
  • (4)Use more clothing hanging around the room.
  • (5)Obtain reproduction map which depicts Virginia as well as the western country.

THE YARD.

  • (1)Replace current fencing with Chevaux-de-frise documented for the enclosure of the area. (Note: Fencing is essential to the control of visitors and interpretation of the complex.)
  • (2)A large tent or marquee for interpretation with benches for seating.
  • (3)Acquisition of wagons, limbers and other transportation vehicles for use and display.

SITE DESIGNATION.

  • The naming of the site should be altered to "Public Magazine." This alteration in the designation of the site will clearly identify the Magazine as a public building with interpretive ties to other public buildings within the community.

5

PHASE ONE INTERPRETATION.

The high visitation of the Magazine and Guard House and its physical layout dictate much of the interpretive program at the site. It is not possible, for example, for us to admit visitors to the interior of the Guard House during peek summer visitation which reaches 5,000 plus visitors per day. The narrow circular staircase also presents challenges.

For these reasons and for interpretive potential, it has been decided that the Magazine's interpretation will be seasonal. During various portions of the year specific time periods in the Magazine's story will be focused upon. This will allow the interpretive program to cover the entire historical period called for by the "charter document" (1754 to 1781) and to make the most effective use of available interpretive space. Those focus periods will be has follows:

  • January 1 to March 31 - FRENCH AND INDIAN WAR PERIOD (1754-1765)
  • April 1 to July 4 - EARLY REVOLUTIONARY WAR YEARS (1774-1776)
  • July 5 to September 30 - MID TO LATE REVOLUTIONARY WAR YEARS (1777-1781)
  • October 1 to December 31 - PEACETIME (1763-1774)

Though focusing on these periods, the Magazine staff would not be locked into these specific time frames exclusively. These time frames provide an opportunity to raise issues which will only be strengthened by comparing and contrasting other time frames. In addition they provide a chance for the visitor to focus on information which we hope will raise questions requiring reference to the Magazine's history as a whole.

In addition to these major focus areas several occurrences should be developed to happen at the Magazine during the course of the week. These occurrences would involve the use of Character Interpreters and Coach and Livestock operations. The following are possible scenarios.

  • (1)Benjamin Powell and/or Joseph Kidd discussing repairs to the Magazine.
  • (2)Delivery or removal of boxes and stores from the Magazine. These items could be loaded, carted away and later returned for the interpretive effect of portraying the Magazine as a storehouse.
  • (3)During certain seasons we would continue the use of weapons and tactics demonstrations for the general public.
  • (4)The use of craftsmen within Craft Programs to repair or 7 make items necessary for the Magazine and Militia program represents an opportunity to make connections throughout the community. Craftsmen who could assist in this area are the Blacksmith, Gunsmith, Cooper, Harnessmaker and Wheelright.

Larger events should also be tied to the interpretive program. We would suggest the following.

  • (1)Coordinating the Publick Times and Fairs encampment with the Magazine's interpretive program to enhance the interpretation of the Magazine as a functioning warehouse. This would include the transporting of items to and from the Magazine for the encampment.
  • (2)Development of Militia Muster days which would utilize H. A. P. 0. staff to represent the James City County Militia. The event would take place twice a year on the Market Square; designed to show the community aspects of militia days and the relation between the Magazine and the equipping of militia.
  • (3)The sponsoring of smaller encampments during the year, possibly on the Country Road, would allow us to demonstrate the supplying of a military force from a complex such as the Magazine. In the case of such an encampment we would need to rely on volunteer assistance from re-enactment groups.

There are also several locations within the Historic Area with whom interpretations should be coordinated to insure similar information and the reinforcement of the Magazine as a governmental complex in the community.

  • (1)The Anderson Forge. As this interpretation is developed it is essential that information be shared. Anderson as the Public Armorer also has a connection with the Magazine and coordination of interpretations will insure reinforcement of our interpretive goals at both sites. It is the recommendation of the Team that as training is developed for these areas that interpreters be cross trained to insure familiarity with the interpretive information at both sites.
  • (2)The Gunsmith's Shop. Here too, the visitor will find similar descriptions of weapons technology. All efforts should be made to insure that interpretations are coordinated.
  • (3)The Capitol. As public buildings, the Magazine and Guardhouse were funded, equipped and stocked from funds raised and approved by the institutions housed in the Capitol. Interpretations should be coordinated between these two sites to reinforce this relationship for our visitors.
  • (4)The Governor's Palace. The Governor, as the King's 8 representative and the commander and chief of the colony's and later state's forces, had a direct relationship to the Magazine and the use of its stores. Dunmore, the last Royal Governor, ordered the removal of the gunpowder from the Magazine in 1775, an event which relates directly to the entrance of Virginia into the Revolutionary gar. Interpretations here should reinforce and enhance the objectives of both sites.

This interpretive "cross referencing" will require the cooperation and assistance of all Historic Area interpreters. To accomplish it mill require increased communication and awareness of this aspect of interpretation. We would suggest that this may be accomplished during training sessions. Whenever training for any of these related sites is conducted interpretive connections should be stressed. In addition, briefings could be held with supervisors and interpreters and these connections should be focused upon during Core Curriculum classes (for example the session on the military).

"Fact sheets" should also be developed to give interpreters information to refer to when attempting to develop these interpretations. These could be developed into resource files available on site to interpreters as they continue to develop and reinforce this type of "cross referenced" interpretation.

9

JANUARY 1 TO MARCH 31 FRENCH AND INDIAN WAR PERIOD 1754-1765.

System of Operation:

The Magazine's front yard entrance will be closed during the winter operation. The only entrance/exit into the Magazine yard will be at the Guard House.

Individual visitors will have their tickets or passes checked at the Guard House where they will wait, seated inside for the tour to begin. Operation will consist of either 2 or 3 tours per hour (depending on visitor demand) beginning at 20 or 30 minute intervals respectively.

One staff interpreter will conduct the entire tour from start to finish.

Sequence.

Guard House Interpretation. (7 minutes)

Late arrivals will be admitted at the Guard House until either capacity is reached or the group departs for the Magazine. When operating 3 tours per hour the visitor's wait for the next tour will be 10 minutes or less.

Armorer's Room Interpretation (7 to 10 minutes)

Due to limited space, when a group exceeds 24 persons the interpretation of the Armorer's room will not be attempted.

Second Floor Interpretation (7 to 10 minutes)

The group will pass through the Gunpowder Room continuing up the stairs to the Second Floor for the interpretation.

Musket Demonstration (5 minutes - optional)

A musket demonstrations makes an effective ending for the tour and if conducted near the exit, will assist in clearing the yard at the completion of the tour. The staff's ability to support this portion of the interpretive program will depend on the funding of staff levels for the winter season.

Total Tour Length: 30 minutes (including walking time)

35 minutes if the Musket Demonstration is included.

Requirements for Implementation.

Total staffing:1 Supervisor
1 Armorer
6 Interpreters
Average daily staffing:1 Supervisor or Armorer
4 Interpreters
9
Costuming:1754-1765 period clothing, primarily civilian.
Furnishings:18 Wooden benches for seating visitors in the Guard House.

(Note: These benches will be utilized in the yard during the summer season.)

Hours of Operation: January 2 - March 15, q: 00 a. m. to 4:00 p. m. March 16 to March 31, 9:00 a. m. to 5:00 p. m.

Special Programming: January 2 to March 14 Weapons Demonstrations mill be presented in the Magazine yard at 4:15 p. m. 3 or 4 days per week.

Interpretive Objectives.

To show the function of the Magazine in supplying arms, equipment and gunpowder for the defense of the Colony during the French and Indian Bar.

To emphasize Virginia's role in breaking the French stronghold on western territories, opening them for occupation and expansion of the British Empire.

To consider the military and political significance of the French and Indian War in preparing. Colonial attitudes and institutions for the War of Independence.

Interpretive Topics.

Guard House.

  • Construction of the Guard House.
  • Establishment of a Magazine guard and the men who constituted that guard.
  • Brief synopsis of the French and Indian War emphasizing Virginia's role.
  • Washington and Braddock.
  • Capture of Quebeck.
  • Surrender of Montreal.

Armorer's Shop.

  • Role and function of the Magazine's armorers and keepers.
  • The men who held these positions.
  • "Civil service" jobs.

Second Floor.

11

Information on the Magazine.

  • Construction, purpose, location, architecture.
  • History of the Magazine up to and including the F & I war period.
  • Systems of supply.
  • Contents of the building and their relationship to military supply.
  • British and Virginia military systems.

Musket Demonstrations.

  • Weapons, uniforms and equipment of the soldier.
  • Technology of the weapon.
  • Tactics of the weapon.

RR125001 January 1 to March 31; French and Indian War Period 1754-65

12

APRIL 1 TO JULY 4 - EARLY REVOLUTIONARY WAR YEARS 1774-1776.

System of Operation.

The Magazine will run "open" with free flowing visitor traffic in the early morning and late afternoon hours. Interpreters will rotate on the half hour through a series of stations in the Magazine. Several other interpreters will work in much the same manner in the Magazine yard.

During the busier portions of the day (10:30 a. m. to 3:30 P.m.) formal interpretations will be conducted on a 15 minute cycle of 4 tours per hour. The maximum number of guests per tour will be 65, meaning a capacity of 260 visitors per hour. Should visitation exceed this capacity operations will be modified to an open flow situation.

Due to the large numbers of visitors the Guard House will not be open but may be viewed from the windows. In addition weapons demonstrations will take place in the Magazine yard daily except Sunday on the hour f roan 10: 00 a. m. to 4: 01) p. m.

Sequence.

Five interpreters will rotate through a series of stations in the Magazine. These stations include the Magazine gate, Armorer's Shop and the Second Floor.

In addition 2 or more interpreters will be stationed in the Magazine yard to interpret the Guard House and conduct hourly weapons demonstrations. During periods of heavy visitation these employees will relieve pressure on the Magazine by conducting interpretations for escorted groups outside in the Magazine yard. A marquee or tent structure capable of seating and protecting 75 people from the elements should be considered. The 18 benches used in the Guard House during the winter would be used to provide seating. This area would provide an option for escorted groups who could receive the Magazine interpretation at this site without waiting to be admitted to the second floor of the building.

The visitor aide will be located at the front entrance sentry boxes to monitor tickets/passes and escorted groups. Once through the entrance visitors will approach the Magazine gate and will be directed to the Armorer's Shop at the rear of the Magazine. As visitors filter through the Armorer's Shop and complete a circle of the building, a line is formed at the front (Powder Room) door. From this point, groups of up to 65 guests (260 per hour) will be sent upstairs to the Second Floor for a 7 to 10 minute interpretive presentation and a short question and answer period. The remaining 5 to 8 minutes is required for transit up and down the stairs. The group exits into the Magazine yard.

13

Requirements for Implementation.

Total staffing:Supervisor
1 Armorer
8 Interpreters
1 Visitor Aide
Average daily staffing:1 Supervisor
1 Armorer
5 Interpreters
1 Visitor Aide
Acquisitions:1 large tent possibly modeled after an officers marquee with benches and seating capacity of 75 visitors.
Hours of Operation:7 days per week, 9:00 a. m. to 5:00 p. m.
Special Programming:Prelude to Independence (May 15); 4th of July Programs; Sponsoring of an Encampment for 1 weekend.

Interpretive Objectives.

To investigate the events leading Virginia through the transition from a loyal British Colony to a "revolutionary" state.

To show the function of the Magazine in the initial stages of mobilization (supplying arms, equipment, and gunpowder) of the developing Virginia military organization.

Interpretive Topics.

Armorer' s Shop.

  • Role and function of the Magazine's armorers and keepers.
  • The teen who held these positions.
  • "Civil service" jobs.

Second Floor.

  • Information on the Magazine.

Construction, purpose, location, architecture.

  • History of the Magazine up to and including 1776.
  • Systems of supply.
  • Contents of the building and their relationship to military supply.
  • British and Virginia military systems.
  • Prelude to Independence and Independence day.
  • Virginia in the early Revolution.
14

Andrew Lewis raising the Virginia Continental troops.

  • Local battles within the time frame.
  • Norfolk, Great Bridge, Gwynn's Island, D. Morgan and Va.
  • Troops in Quebeck, Trenton 177b.

Musket Demonstrations.

  • Weapons, uniforms and equipment of the soldier.
  • Technology of the weapon.
  • Tactics of the weapon.

RR125002 April 1 to July 4; Early Revolutionary War Years 1774-1776

15

JULY 5 TO SEPTEMBER 30 - MID TO LATE REVOLUTIONARY WAR YEARS 1777-1781

System of Operation

The Magazine will run "open" with free flowing visitor traffic through-out the day. Interpreters assigned to the Magazine will rotate through a series of stations including the Magazine gate, Armorer's Room and the Second Floor.

Three or more interpreters will be assigned to interpret at a lean-to where continuous interpretation, military music and weapons demonstrations will be presented from 10:00 a. m. to 4:00 p. m. Weapons demonstrations will be performed on the half hour, except Sundays.

This system has proven to accommodate as many as 948 visitors per hour (5,031 visitors per day/26,000 visitors per week).

A small military camp will be set up to use for occasional demonstrations to provide a setting for discussion of the Virginia State Garrison Regiment and the camp life of the regular soldier.

The Guard House will be kept closed, and exhibited through the windows.

Sequence.

As stated in the system of operation, three interpreters are assigned to the various stations in the Magazine. In addition 3 or more interpreters pro-vide continuo-us interpretation at the large lean-to located between the -Magazine and Guard House. The visitor aide will be at the sentry boxes.

To preclude the necessity of every guest visiting the second floor of the Magazine, the lean-to interpretation will provide an interpretation which gives a broad overview. Interpretations will include 1st person characterizations, fife and drum music, military life, the establishment of the Virginia State Garrison Regiment as well as more complete information about the Magazine.

Requirements for Implementation

Total staffing:1 Supervisor
1 Armorer
8 Interpreters
1 to 3 Casual Interpreters
2 to 5 Fife and Drum casuals
1 Visitor Aide
Average daily staffing:1 Supervisor
16
1 Armorer
5 Interpreters
2 Casual Interpreters
3 Fife and Drum casuals
1 Visitor Aide
Acquisitions: 1 large tent possibly modeled after an officers marquee with benches and seating capacity for 75 visitors.
Hours of Operation: 7 days per week, 9: 00 a. m. to 5: 00 p. m.
Special Programming: The encampment for Public Times and Fairs; Weapons and tactics demonstrations.

Interpretive Objectives.

To provide the visitor with a myriad of Revolutionary War experiences including weapons demonstration, field music interpretations and 1st person characterizations.

To interpret the growing difficulties encountered by the Magazine in supplying arms, equipment, and gunpowder for the defense of the State of Virginia during the late war years.

To interpret how the experience of the war informed attitudes about the role of the military in a republican state.

Interpretive Topics.

Armorer' s Shop.

  • Role and function of the Magazine's armorers and keepers.
  • The men who held these positions. "Civil service" jobs.

Second Floor.

  • Information on the Magazine.
  • Construction, purpose, location, architecture.
  • History of the Magazine up to and including 1781.
  • Systems of supply.
  • Contents of the building and their relationship to military supply.
  • Formation of the Public & store and construction of the "new" magazine.
  • British and Virginia military systems.
  • Moving of the capitol to Richmond.

Magazine Yard.

  • Military encampments.
  • Weapons demonstrations.
  • Field music.
17

Interpretations of military life and crafts.

  • 1st Person characterizations.
  • French entrance into the Revolutionary War.
  • Raising of the Virginia State Garrison Regiment.
  • Important battles within the time frame.
  • Germantown, Charlestown, Campden, Yorktown.

RR125003 July 5 to September 30; Mid to Late Revolutionary War Years 1777-1781

18

OCTOBER 1 TO DECEMBER 31 - PEACETIME 1763 TO 1774.

System of Operation.

The Magazine will run "open" with free flowing visitor traffic in the early morning and late afternoon hours. Interpreters will rotate on the half hour through a series of stations in the Magazine. Several other interpreters will work in much the sane manner in the Magazine yard.

During the busier portions of the day (10:30 a. m. to 3:30 P.m.) formal interpretations will be conducted on a 15 minute cycle of 4 tours per hour. The maximum number of guests per tour will be 65, meaning a capacity of 260 visitors per hour. Should visitation exceed this capacity operations will be modified to an open flow situation.

Due to the large numbers of visitors the Guard House will not be open but may be viewed from the windows. In addition weapons demonstrations will take place in the Magazine yard daily except Sunday on the hour from 10:00 a. m. to 4:00 p. m.

Sequence.

Five interpreters will rotate through a series of stations in the Magazine. These stations include the Magazine gate, Armorer's Shop and the Second Floor.

In addition 2 or more interpreters will be stationed in the Magazine yard to interpret the Guard House and conduct hourly weapons demonstrations. During periods of heavy visitation these employees will relieve pressure on the Magazine by conducting interpretations for escorted groups outside in the Magazine yard. A marquee or tent structure capable of seating and protecting 75 people from the elements should be considered. The 18 benches used in the Guard House during the winter would be used to provide seating. This area would provide an option for escorted groups who could receive the Magazine interpretation at this site without waiting to be admitted to the second floor of the building.

The visitor aide will be located at the front entrance sentry boxes to monitor tickets/passes and escorted groups. Once through the entrance visitors will approach the Magazine gate and will be directed to the Armorer's Shop at the rear of the Magazine. As visitors filter through the Armorer's Shop and complete a circle of the building, a line is formed at the front (Powder Room) door. From this point, groups of up to 65 guests (260 per hour) will be sent upstairs to the Second Floor for a 7 to 10 minute interpretive presentation and a short question and answer period. The remaining 5 to 8 minutes is required for transit up and down the stairs. The group exits into the Magazine yard.

19

Requirements for Implementation.

Total staffing:1 Supervisor
1 Armorer
8 Interpreters
1 Visitor Aide
Average daily staffing:1 Supervisor
1 Armorer
5 Interpreters
1 Visitor Aide
Acquisitions:1 large tent possibly modeled after an officers marquee with benches and seating capacity of 75 visitors.
Hours of Operation:7 days per week, 9:00 a. m. to 5:00 p. m.
Special Programming:Militia Muster.

Interpretive Objectives

To interpret the role of the Magazine during peacetime. The storage of arms and supplies and keeping the in a state of readiness was the ideal. The deficiency of this system however frequently caused decay of military stores kept in the Magazine.

To show the function of the Magazine in supplying arms, equipment, and gunpowder to the Virginia militia for police functions and the defense of the Western borders.

To interpret the role of the Magazine as an extension of the British military establishment.

Interpretive Topics.

Armorer's Shop.

  • Role and function of the Magazine's armorers and keepers.
  • The men who held these positions.
  • "Civil service" jobs.

Second Floor.

  • Information on the Magazine.
  • Construction, purpose, location, architecture.
  • History of the Magazine up to and including 1774.
  • Systems of supply.
  • Contents of the building and their relationship to military supply.
  • 20
  • British and Virginia military systems.
  • Peacetime condition of supplies stored in the Magazine.
  • Disposing of F & I War supplies and disbanding of the Magazine guard.
  • Dunmore's War.

Musket Demonstrations.

  • Weapons, uniforms and equipment of the soldier.
  • Technology of the weapon.
  • Tactics of the weapon.

RR125004 October 1 to December 31; Peacetime 1763 to 1774

21

TRAINING.

In order to successfully achieve the interpretive goals, Magazine staff members will take part in the following training program:

The first increment will consist of 40 hours of training conducted over five consecutive days. Days 1-3 Rill be devoted to day-long seminars centered around the following topics:

  • 1.History of the Magazine; biographies of the keepers and armorers.
  • 2.Governmental relationships.
  • 3.The military in the 18th century (focusing on supply and logistics where possible).
Prior to each of these seminars, staff members will have studied selected reading materials pertaining to each topic. (Readings will be selected by the Magazine Interpretive Planning Team.) Each seminar will begin with a one-hour lecture that, along with the readings, will establish the context for the discussion to follow. The discussion period will be guided by the assigned leader/lecturer and will run for approximately two hours. It will deal with a series of the sub-themes and their relationship to the major topic. Examples of sub-themes include the militia system and Virginia's relationship to the British Empire. (These, too, will be determined by the Interpretive Planning Team.)

The afternoon sessions of each seminar will consist of a practicum during which staff members will discuss and design methods for applying the ideas and information to interpretation. Skill practices will be conducted so that interpreters can become familiar with. the new material.

Day 4 will consist of an examination of the reinterpreted environment and the rearrangement of artifacts. Staff will discuss with Jay Gaynor the reasoning behind the changes and the interpretive significance of various elements, from particular artifacts to the space as a whole. The day will conclude with application. Interpreters will practice working in the space and using the artifacts.

Day 5 will be spent exploring ways of interweaving the three topics and relating them to the 18th century Williamsburg community. Re will also determine ways to connect with and relate to the objectives of other exhibition areas. Again, an application session and skill practices will be conducted.

Each of these session will include practical application of the interpretive objective, topics of the specific interpretive "periods." In addition emphasis will be placed on use of the new objects and traffic patterns to assist the interpreter in accomplishing the interpretive objectives.

22

This first increment of training will be followed by three additional seminars, each fours hours in length, conducted just prior to the seasonal change in interpretation. These sessions will explore the interpretive objectives and topics for the upcoming interpretive season. The topics and readings for each seminar will be selected by the Magazine Interpretive Planning Team.

It is also important that a collection of resources dealing with the collections in the complex, interpretive material and the general subject of the 18th century military and weapons be available on site for training and interpreter reference.

23

PHASE ONE COST ESTIMATE.

Collections alterations.$5,180Applied for in 1986 budget.
Additional staffing.20,445Applied for in 1986 budget.
Training.3,465Applied for in 1986 budget.
Tent or marquis.1,000
Benches (18).2, 500
Costuming.1,280(Assuming that transfer clothing is not available.)
TOTAL.$33,870

The cost of fencing for the Magazine yard has not yet been determined.

PHASE ONE TIME SCHEDULE.

Time required to develop phase one research and collections: 6 months.

Training and refitting for the Magazine: 1 creek. (Note that during this period the Magazine and Guard House would close to the public.)

It is our opinion that the Phase One interpretive program should open to the public no later than January 1, 1987.

PROGRAM EVALUATION.

The evaluation of the interpretive program is essential. As implementation of the interpretive plan proceeds the planning team in consultation with Connie Graft will develop methods and questions for the evaluation. The first evaluation should take place prior to any change in the interpretive program. Evaluations should then be taken at each seasonal change.

The points to be tested in the evaluation will be the broad interpretive objectives. Of major interest in the evaluation will be visitor understanding of the role of the Magazine in the defense of Virginia and its place in the Colony's/State's government.

24

PHASE TWO PROPOSALS.

The Magazine and Guard House are one of the Foundations major exhibition buildings and interpretive sites. Despite this fact, the historical information available to aid interpreters in communicating this importance to the Foundation's visitors is extremely limited. While the planning team feels that it is possible for us to re-evaluate and improve our current interpretations, it is quite obvious that any significant alteration in the interpretation will be contingent on a major research undertaking by the Foundation to address certain basic questions. Such an undertaking will represent significant new ground in the research and interpretation of the Magazine and its importance to Williamsburg and Virginia.

These questions can be broken down into two basic categories. The first is the physical environs, including the objects and items which were used to supply the military organizations of Virginia. The second deals with process and the manner in which the supply of military forces was connected to the community and to the government of Virginia. The investigation of these questions will involve the resources of the Departments of Archaeology, Architecture, Collections and Research. What follows is a summation of the research by these departments which is requested by the Magazine Interpretive Planning Team.

Archaeology.

Archaeological investigation of the Magazine/Guard House complex would attempt to determine the use of this area during the 18th century. Several additional buildings are identified on period maps or have been discovered by earlier investigation of the site. No attempt has been made, however, to determine whether these buildings were connected to the function of the Magazine. It is also hoped that investigation of the area would lead us to a better understanding of how space was used, and for what purposes it was used. This information should be sought for the Magazine itself, as well as any other building which can be identified and the yard itself.

The first step in this process would involve the testing of the area to see whether enough information exists in the ground to make the exhibition of the area viable. There is the possibility that grading of the area during the 1930' s and 1940' s may have destroyed archaeological evidence. A phase one testing would be used to determine this. The process would involve the excavation of seven 2.5 foot square test areas. Cost for the phase one testing are estimated at $971.00.

Should phase one testing indicate intact layers and structural remains a phase two testing would be proposed designed to answer specific questions concerning the Magazine property at an approximate cost of $35,000. At this juncture it would be advisable to evaluate 25 the archaeological project to determine what additional excavation would be advisable.

Architecture.

It is the suggestion of architectural research that specific documentation of the Magazine and Guard House be reviewed. Though it is unlikely that new discoveries would be major the re-evaluation of the material in light of current architectural research is needed. In addition documentation and physical evidence for analogous buildings in the English speaking world would be investigated. The results of these investigations would be recommendations from Architecture as to possible changes to the current restoration, furnishings and interpretations. This portion of the research project would be handled by current staffing and resources.

Collections.

Collections would need to coordinate their research closely with Architectural research in determining by what means military weapons and accouterments were stored during the period. In addition extensive research will be required to establish the types of containers which will need to be reproduced and the identification of military stores to be reproduced for use in the Magazine/Guard House complex.

Research Department.

Document research will be conducted centering around several broad issues. A comprehensive investigation concerning military supply in Virginia during the last half of the 18th century should be addressed which would need to include the relationships between the Magazine and community, government and "empire." The development of this theme is essential to see how Virginians laid the basis for an "American" military establishment. This research with the necessary Collections research detailed above could be effected by the hiring of a full time researcher for a period of 2 years at an approximate salary of $30,000 per year (including employee related expenses). Funding should also include approximately $2,000 per year for travel and materials so that available information at other institutions may be investigated.

Research Coordination.

Throughout the course of the research project we feel that a forum group should be created which would include the principle researchers in each area and a representative group of trainers managers and interpreters. The purpose of this group would be to explore information as it becomes available, share it among researchers 26 and discuss the interpretive applications of that information. An additional function of this group would be to formalize all research into a source book, to include information, photographs, bibliography and maps for the future training of interpreters.

The role of the Magazine Interpretive Planning Team during this phase will be to monitor the progress of the research and to seek ways of implementing new interpretive information into the existing interpretive program.

27

PHASE THREE.

Phase three of the Magazine Interpretive Planning Team Proposal would involve the reassembling of the Planning Team to consider the interpretive plan in light of new information and research. While we hope that much of the interpretive information could be assimilated into interpretations as it becomes available, certain major issues may remain outstanding. Any physical changes to the Magazine/Guard House and its collections would need to be addressed at this time as well as the possible reorientation of the sites interpretive objectives. Throughout this process continuing training for the staff will be a major consideration.

28

APPENDIX.

29

INTERPRETIVE PLANNING TEAM
CHARTER DOCUMENT

Place of Exhibition, Tour, or Special Program: Powder Magazine and Guardhouse.

Team Leader:Bill White
Team Members: Bill White, Kevin Kelly, Bill Weldon, Jeff Geyer, John Hill, and Collier Harris. As needed, Jay Gaynor, Betty Leviner, Ed Chappell, and
Due Date: August 1, 1985 for a draft interpretive plan and recommendations for further research and material needs.

A . HISTORICAL SPECIFICATIONS:

Setting:

The Magazine, Guardhouse, and the surrounding yard in the years 1754-1781.

Principal Artifacts:

In the Magazine: guns, ammunition, barrels of gun powder, containers of military goods (uniforms, canteens, tents, etc.), misc. military regalia (colors, drums, etc.), armorer's work shop (bench, tools, etc.).

In the Guardhouse: simple furniture and personal items.

Outside: field artillery pieces, caissons, wagons. If set up to reflect garrisoned troops, tents, cooking equipment.

Demonstrated or Implied Activities:

The gathering and disbursement of military supplies, weapon's repair, and maintenance. Eighteenth-century military drill tactics and the routine of camp life.

Historical Cast of Characters:

Public Armorer, Keeper of the Magazine, civilian guards, Quartermaster, and other supply-oriented military personnel, civilian suppliers, Governor, President of the Council and other civil authorities, provincial soldiers, both enlisted men and officers, and Williamsburg and James City militia men.

2

Key Social Relationships:

A wide range of complex relationships could be presented at the Magazine. Civilian suppliers could be seen haggling over prices with officers responsible for logistics. Military troop commanders would implore supply officers for more timely issue of weapons and ammunition. Civilian political authorities could be seen checking the adequacy of the Magazine stores. The efforts to instill proper military procedures and bearing in part-time soldiers could be demonstrated. The unequal relationship, both in living conditions and authority, between enlisted men and their superiors could be displayed. The relationship between soldiers and civilians could grow tense as each reacted to perceived slights and abuses.

Connections with Other Sites:

The Anderson forges, where the public armorer James Anderson may have done some of the repair of public arms, and the Hay Shop, where gunstocks were made during the Revolution. The Governor's Palace, where the colony's chief executive officer bore the main responsibility for the colony's military readiness, and specifically where Dunmore made the decision to siege the colony's gunpowder in 1775. The Capitol, where legislation was passed authorizing military expenditures both in peace and wartime.

B. INTERPRETIVE GOAL:

At the Magazine visitors should learn how Virginia provided for its military defense. The colonial experience and reliance on a militia system required armament and equipment to be kept in readiness to meet any threat to royal and civil authority. The procurement, storage, maintenance (or lack thereof), issuance, and us-a of this equipment is central to our theme. It relates directly to the militia organization and to the regular provincial military organization developed first during the Seven Years War and again at the outbreak of the American Revolution. The equipping of Virginia militia, British and provincial regulars, as well as the American army of the Revolution, brings to light the interrelations between the Virginia colonial government and royal authority; between an independent Virginia and the Continental Congress. Visitors should see the importance of the Magazine and its stores as a civil institution, with its relationship to the military defense of the "country" and how it reflects on the developing concept of the military's role in American government.

3

Suggested Topics:

  • 1.Civil governmental responsibilities for Virginia defense and British imperial objectives.
  • 2.The militia system, its organization, use, and effectiveness.
  • 3.The role of the Magazine and its stores in the developing tensions between Virginia and the mother country, especially the gunpowder incident and its relation to Virginias responsibility for defense.
  • 4.Military structure, practices, logistics, and administration of the British and provincial armies.
  • 5.Eighteenth-century weapons, equipment, and tactics.
  • 6.The social background of the militia men, provincial soldiers, and their experience in camp and in the field.
  • 7.Relationship between the Magazine, Virginia Public Stores, and military purchasing agents.

"Becoming Americans" Storyline:

By the mid-eighteenth century, the government of Virginia had developed a militia system for the protection and defense of the "country." The experiences gained in the organization and equipping of the militia left Virginia unprepared for the maintenance of the regular army, both provincial and British, which began in 1754 when Virginia was required to join England in her conflict with her European rivals. The lessons learned during the Seven Years War, together with the experience of the Revolution, would do much to shape views concerning the role of the military in American civil government.

Virginian's experience with the militia system and with the British concepts of a standing army are central to this experience. With the militia system and its provisioning through installations such as the Williamsburg Magazine, Virginia's civil government had taken primary responsibility for her defense, policing and maintaining of accepted social order. Though British in concept, the Virginia militia by the mid-eighteenth century had been substantially altered to meet the needs of the New World experience, especially important was its reenforcement of the hierarchical values of local society. Virginia would continue to depend on British concepts in the development of military stores and in the utilization of regular troops, first in 1755 and again in 1775. They would however, place strong control over these military necessities to insure that effective military organization still remained subordinate to civil governmental authority.

4

Providing a steady supply of military goods for an army proved to be a struggle. Securing an adequate number of capable recruits was difficult. Citizens became familiar with the harshness of military life. All these war-related difficulties revealed the deep gap between the ideal of the volunteer citizen soldier and the realities of military readiness. This awareness contributed to the debate about the proper role of a permanent military establishment in a society committed to republican values. At the end of the Revolutionary War, this debate was still unresolved.

C. RESOURCES:

Available Staffing: Assume staffing levels for 1985 will be available in 1986 without increase or decrease.

Training and Materials: Additional training hours beyond the amounts budgeted for the Magazine staff should be estimated and requested as part of the planning process. Similarly, materials needed to support the revised interpretation should be specified and their costs estimated. Funds will then be sought on a priority basis for these training and material needs for 1986.

Research Support: Existing research reports on the Magazine and military topics have been gathered by the research department, and additional readings and research findings relevant to interpretation will be made available by Mr. Kelly as discussions proceed.

D. INTERPRETIVE METHODS:

Audiences and Seasonality: Assume that the Magazine and Guardhouse will continue to operate on a seasonal basis in 1986 as in 1985. Interpretation should be designed to handle general visitation to the site, sometimes in large numbers during busy times, as well as guided groups of students. It is important that all of the spaces and places within the Magazine complex be exploited to achieve a rich experience for the visitor without a sense of crowding or waiting.

Techniques: We should seize the opportunity presented at the Magazine to have visitors see, learn about, and participate in activities that would have taken place in the Magazine compound during the period of interpretation. Demonstrations of various kinds, reenactments, first person, third person, and character interpretation, and an historically authentic setting, materiel, and costuming are appropriate techniques toward this end and should be considered in planning. Informational signs, printed flyers, and facsimile documents can also be effective aids to interpretation and should be considered in planning for this site.

July 5, 1985
To: Public Magazine Interpretive Planning Team
From: Jay Gaynor
Subject: Proposal for Research and Subsequent Refurnishing of Magazine

The purpose of this memo is to propose a "target" date for furnishing the Magazine, to recommend the basic documents to be used, and to outline, in very general terms, the processes involved. Several suggestions are made for "interim" measures that will improve the presentation of the site prior to refurnishing. A number of recommendations made by you have been included.

The ten-year Plan for Educational Programming and Operations defines the period for interpretation of the Public Magazine to be 1754 to 1781, dates established by the commencement of the Seven Years War and the removal of the capital to Richmond.

Other factors affect the selection of a "target" date or dates far refurnishing the building. The Guard House and enclosing wall were built in 1755, precluding a pre-1755 interpretation. Little is known of the building's contents during the Seven Years War, and that aside, furnishing the building to reflect only the war years (1754-1753) would tend to dictate a narrow concentration of interpretation.

In 1776, another magazine was built at Williamsburg, and separating "Public Stores" functions between the two facilities, as well as any other storage locations which may have been in use, becomes difficult. Furthermore, the years of the Revolution even more than those of the Seven Years War presented an extraordinary situation at the Public Magazine, and an attempt to furnish the building to a post-1775 date would promote interpretation centered around the events of that war. This suggests that a post-Seven Years War/pre-Revolutionary War period (ca. 1763-ca. 1775) of furnishing would give us more flexibility in presenting a broader scope of the Magazine's history: its service as a British military facility during the Seven Years War, as a slow-paced and possibly ineptly managed peacetime warehouse, as a focal point of the unrest in Virginia with the Dunmore gunpowder incident, and finally as a facility of the new State of Virginia during the Revolution.

The earliest detailed documentation of stores located at the Magazine during the 1763-1775 period is an inventory taken in 1764 by members of the House of Burgesses. The keeper of the Magazine, George Pitt, contended that many of the items in the building, probably an accumulation resulting from the recent war, were in danger of spoiling if they were permitted to remain. The House appointed a committee to investigate the situation and report "what Stores it may be proper to dispose of":

Thursday, the 20th of December, 5 Geo. iii. 1764.

Mr. Attorney, from the Committee to whom the Representation of George Pitt, Keeper of the publick Magazine in the City of Williamsburg was referred, reported that they had examined into the State of the said Magazine, and the public military Stores contained therein, and had agreed to the following Report thereupon.

It appears to your Committee that there are now in the said Magazine two Brass Cannon and two Brass Mortars, which are useless; also about 13,000 lbs. of Gunpowder, which is old, and the Barrels decayed and in bad order; also a Quantity of Soldiers Clothes, Hats, and Shoes, which at the present are of little Use, and will be entirely ruined if they remain there: That there are also 102 Tents, which are old and useless; and 14 new Ones, which may be of Service: That there are also two Hogsheads of Cantins and Tin Kettles, one Tierce of Leather Shot Bags, and another of Canvas Knapsacks, and a Quantity of Leather Belts and Slings, old Drums and Drum Rims, which are useless; and a Number of Cartouch Boxes, in very bad Order: That there are also upwards of 500 old Firelocks and Barrels, which might be repaired at 12s.6d. each, but are not worth the Expense; and there is a Tub of Gun Flints, which may be reserved for Use

(Journals of the House of Burgesses of Virginia 1761-1765, Vol. 10, p. 306).

The next surviving inventory of contents was made by another committee of the House of Burgesses in June 1775. Tension was high between Lord Dunmore and the town, and the Burgesses wanted to protect military stores with which the Lieutenant Governor might be tempted to tamper.

Tuesday, the 13th of June, 15 Geo. iii. 1775

Mr. Mercer reported from the Committee appointed to inspect the Magazine in this City, and inquire into the Stores belonging to the same, that the Committee had inspected the said Magazine, and inquired into the said Stores accordingly, and had directed him to report the Same . . . .

It appears to your Committee from the Deposition of John Frederick Miller, keeper of the magazine, that in June last there were there thirty barrels of Gun Powder, containing each about fifty weight, in indifferent order . . . . That the President, soon after, sent to the Governor, then on the Frontiers, eight of those powder barrels he had sifted, three hundred Muskets, Bayonets, Cartouch boxes, and Carbines, which have never been returned; That one hundred and fifty of the said Muskets were furnished out of the Palace, and soon after replace out of the Magazine . . . .

That, about the middle of April last, the said Miller delivered up the Keys of the Magazine to the Governor, and he then left there twenty one barrels and .a half of Powder, . . . three hundred and forty two new Muskets, lately cleaned, and in complete order, others that wanted but small repairs, and a large number of old Muskets, and other small Guns, almost useless, and many other Articles, which he could not enumerate. . .

Your Committee farther Report, that before they proceeded to examine any Witnesses they waited on his Excellency, to request that he would be pleased to direct the Keeper of the Magazine to give them access thereto, and, having received the Keys three days after their first application, they immediately proceeded to inspect the Magazine, and found therein nineteen Halberts, one hundred and fifty seven trading Guns in pretty good order, but very indifferent in kind, fifty one Pewter Basons, eight Camp Kettles, one hundred and eight new Muskets without Locks, and about five hundred and twenty seven old Muskets, the barrels very rusty, and the Locks almost useless, twelve hundred Cartouch boxes, fifteen hundred Cutlasses with Scabbards, one hundred and seventy Pistol Holsters, one hundred and fifty old Pistols, or thereabouts, with and without Locks, fifty Mallets, two bundles of match Rope, two hundred Cantines, thirty five small Swords in bad order, one Tent and Tent Poles, one Hogshead of Powder Horns, and hundred and twenty seven Bayonets, one hundred Knapsacks in the Smiths Shop, and that part of the Magazine called the Armory, also one half Barrel of Dust and rotten Powder, one half barrel and a quarter of unsifted Powder, tolerably good, in the Powder Room, that has no communication with the Armory, also five half Barrels of loose Powder buried in a Hole in the Magazine yard, the top of which, (in quantity about two half barrels) was totally destroyed by the late Rains, the rest very damp, but quite sound; this, his Excellency acknowledged to your Committee, was buried there by his orders. The deficiency, this Committee suppose, is owing to the fifteen half barrels which Captain Collins moved from the Magazine, as acknowledged in the Governor's Message to this House . . . .

That the Doors and Windows of the Magazine now want Repairs, which being done, your Committee are of Opinion that it will be sufficiently secure, it never having proved otherwise since its first erection, now sixty years past, until since the Powder was taken by order to the Governor aforementioned.

Your Committee also proceeded to inquire what Arms and Ammunition had been, from time to time, deposited in the Magazine, and the disbursements thereof, but could obtain no certain Information respecting the same; the late Keeper being out of the Colony and his Predecessor dead

(Journals of the House of Burgesses of Virginia 1773-1776, Vol. 13, pp. 223-4).

It is likely that neither of these inventories are complete; they appear to omit the furnishings of the Guard House, and they certainly do not include equipment uses by the smith(s) working on the site. They probably also omit all the odds and ends that would have accumulated at the site but which, because of their insignificant value as either surplus materials or military stores, did not deserve mention in official reports to the House. Furthermore, the 1764 inventory does not represent a "normal" quantity of goods at the Magazine (or at least not the usual quantity of goods in normal condition) since the inventory was prompted by the belief that there were unwanted or unneeded surpluses at hand. The 1775 inventory may represent a more normal situation.

I recommend that the Magazine be furnished as we believe it would have appeared in about 1770. This reference date places our interpretive vantage point at a spot midway between the two wars. The 1775 inventory should be the primary document used in furnishing the building, but I suggest that we remain somewhat flexible. If effective utilization of the physical space requires additional or different furnishings, we should be willing to incorporate items listed in the 1764 inventory.

Choosing to interpret this period and relying upon these two inventories result in our representing the Magazine and its furnishings at a time during which its contents, as well as the building itself, were not in the best state of repair. This leads to interesting possibilities. From a furnishing standpoint, it allows us to use antique firearms and accouterments in our collection--most of which honestly show their age-alongside reproductions in "new" condition thereby duplicating a contrast that apparently existed among the original furnishings. It also provides us with a documentary basis for presenting a structure and its contents in less-than-pristine condition. From an interpretive standpoint it gives us an opportunity to discuss civil/military relationships, "civil-service" jobs, and possibly the "Becoming Americans" theme of that typically American trait of not worrying too much about future needs of resources until the resources are actually needed.

FURNISHING PROPOSAL

Basing the refurnishing of the Magazine complex upon the 1764 and 1775 inventories requires the following:

RESEARCH: Although we know from the inventories what the principal materials stored in the Magazine were, aside from the firearms and possibly some of the edged weapons, we do not have a great deal of information about those materials. Most of

The research on military accouterments of this period has centered around those in use during the Revolution. Although work has begun on the Seven Years War period, a great number of questions about military equipment remain unanswered. We know even less about how military equipment was transported and stored, and it seems that research into this area is of prime importance to our use of specific spaces in the building and their architectural finishing, as well as to the fabrication of "free standing" furnishings.

Furnishing the Smith's Shop also will require primary research to determine- appropriate activities for that area and the proper types of tools and implements to be found there.

The Guard House will require the same attention. We should probably begin our work here by determining what would have been normal staffing during our period of interpretation. Was the Guard House used by civilians, militia on duty, and/or British regulars? How did they use it? The answers will significantly affect the furnishings.

Finally, the grounds and their use need thorough investigation. Did the use of the area around the Magazine change seasonally, at times of special military events, or during peacetime versus war years? What activities, if any, would have been undertaken in the Magazine yard? Who performed these outdoor activities? What materials and supplies did they require?

While much of the information required to answer these questions--as well as those relating to various interactions at the site--may be available through more thorough investigation of local sources, it will be necessary to go beyond local materials in an effort to locate information concerning "parallel" sites and activities from which we can extrapolate information likely to apply to the magazine complex. Other sources in the United States will be useful, but it is likely that many questions will require work with English sources, possibly entailing primary research in archival and museum collections there. Another important resource will be archaeological findings from English and English colonial military sites of the period.

Answering questions concerning the proper form and arrangement of furnishings for the Magazine complex will require the concentrated, full-time attention of an experienced researcher for an estimated six to nine months.

ACQUISITION: The Magazine was a warehouse, and judging by the quantities of materials listed in the inventories, it was literally packed with military stores. Within the limitations imposed by the modern requirements of traffic flow and safety, we should reproduce this full, warehouse appearance, in contrast to the rather sparse openness of the present arrangement.

Whenever possible we should strive to use original materials in the Magazine refurnishing. When materials are subject to use or damaging environmental conditions, or when original materials are not obtainable, reproductions will be required.

At present, the majority of the Foundation's military arms and accouterments collection is split between the Magazine and the Palace. Although we should attempt to acquire additional original pieces for use in the Magazine, it is unlikely many appropriate pieces will be available. Certainly, they will not be obtainable in the quantities required to give the building the appearance that we currently believe it should have. Thus, collecting efforts are likely to be directed primarily toward acquiring prototypes for reproducing inventory items or the containers in which they were stored. in the case of most goods, a representative sample .should be in view, while unopened or "false top" containers imply the presence of additional pieces.

There is no-way to predict how long it will take to acquire original pieces. Reproductions, providing they are properly specified by the researcher, should require no more than six to eight months to obtain. Costs cannot be estimated until we have further information about specific items and quantities needed.

ARCHITECTURAL INVESTIGATION: Although general architectural considerations concerning the Magazine and Guard House are outside the scope of this memo, research regarding storage of goods and armorers' work areas may indicate that the present rack and shelf systems in the building are improper. We may need to change them.

IMPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS: The Magazine currently provides a less than ideal environment for the storage of the items to be exhibited there, especially if they are to include original textile or leather goods. The building's environmental controls will have to be improved.

IMPLEMENTATION: Although this also is generally beyond the scope of this memo, the following are important considerations relating to implementing the refurnishing program. They are included here as a reminder that they should form a part of our final proposal:

  • A.Insuring that the research, refurnishing, and site activities are well documented.
  • B.Insuring that interpreters are provided with adequate information about the refurnishing objectives as well as the actual objects included.
  • C.Insuring that adequate conservation measures are implemented to maintain both the original and reproduction items in the complex.
  • D.Insuring that items exhibited in the Magazine, especially original pieces, are secure and not subject to damage through handling by either staff or visitors.
  • E.Insuring that the buildings are properly cleaned.

INTERIM FURNISHING PLAN

All of the above is going to take some time and a significant amount of money to accomplish, and as you have requested, here are several suggestions--probably not a complete list--for interim measures that will improve our presentation at the complex in the meantime. I want to stress that these are off-the-top-of-my-head ideas, and each of them should be checked in whatever sources we have at hand to provide a bit firmer ground for adapting them.

One thing to point out at the beginning is that, assuming "the Magazine" is one building rather than a complex of structures--and the documents certainly. use the term as if it were one building--the 1775 inventory frankly contradicts the new arrangement of shop/powder room ("in the Powder Room, that has no communication with the Armory").

Also this document seems to indicate that the Smiths Room is one of the rooms in the Magazine proper rather than part of another structure. The inventory may be read to say that all of the materials found, except the powder, are contained in the Smiths Shop and the Armory, rather than indicating that just the knapsacks are in the Smiths Shop. This may leave us in the dark--figuratively and otherwise--but it seems the old arrangement follows the evidence more closely. We should ask architectural Research for their opinion.

Many of the following recommendations will require the assistance of collections and conservation personnel. Some may require consultation with architects and other Foundation departments. All are seen to be relatively easy to implement, however, and should contribute to the physical environment required to begin meeting the objectives set forth in the "Charter Document".

SMITH'S ROOM:

  • 1.As soon as possible remove twentieth- and late nineteenth-century tools. If they are needed for repairs or cleaning, keep them in the toolbox or bench, but they should be out of visitors' sight.
  • 2.Investigate the possibility of borrowing more appropriate tools from the Craft Shops Department until our research is complete and we can either purchase or make correct tools.
  • 3.Replace shelving with tool racks similar to those shown in the Johan Zoffany portrait of John Cuff (an enlargement of this painting is in the "Patron-Tradesman" exhibit at the Gallery).
  • 4.Reorganize items stored on the west side of the room so that they look more like storage than display.
  • 5.Remove inventories from central wall.

ENTRANCE ROOM (POWDER ROOM):

  • 1.Remove all non-powder related items.
  • 2.Restack powder barrels and boxes of cartridges so that they appear stored rather than displayed.

SECOND FLOOR:

  • 1.Sand several of the musket boxes so that they appear new.
  • 2.Acquire a half dozen new barrels of various sizes from the coopers.
  • 3.Fabricate a dozen or so wooden boxes of various sizes similar to those in and in front of Greenhow Store.
  • 4.Determine what markings would be appropriate for containers of military supplies (I question markings currently on some of the boxes about the place) and apply them to the barrels and boxes.
  • 5.Group more of the musket boxes together and use groups of new containers, as well as the musket boxes, to protect the original material. Possibly in this way the current barrier effect of the boxes will be relieved.
  • 6.Move as many of these storage containers back against the walls as possible, and stack them deep enough that they provide protection for the original arms. If several tents are available, stack them on top of a couple of boxes or barrels side-by-side. Check with Linda Baumgarten to see if we have reproduction blankets or textiles (which could be wrapped around boards or boxes to appear to be bolts) that she feels would be appropriate. If we do, then stack them also, possibly on one of the shelves on the northwest wall.
  • 7.Remove the British flag and fill the shelves with reproduction cartridge boxes, blankets, uniform parts, or storage boxes.
  • 8.Group the tools and canteens on the northwest wall so that they are stored rather than displayed.
  • 9.Remove the muskets from the third floor, and if a location can be set aside that is well protected by boxes or barrels in front of it and an interpreter stationed nearby, pack a layer of them (very carefully) onto a false bottom in a storage box.
  • 10.See what can be scrounged in the way of old shoes, hats, shirts, and so forth from the Costume Department and stack these on upper shelves.
  • 11.Have a location set up with (decent) reproduction writing equipment and paper as if someone is working in the armory noting quantities of goods, condition, and so forth.
  • 12.If safety regulations will allow, stack some box-s around the stairway so that visitors feel they are walking amid stored items.
  • 13.Investigate improvements in current lighting system.

THIRD FLOOR:

  • 1.Remove all original arms currently stored there. Remove lantern.
  • 2.Install "new" boxes and barrels around stairway, possibly with their tops stacked with goods--which in that light do not have to be of the standard of the goods exhibited on the floor below.

GUARD HOUSE:

  • 1.Remove all modern pieces.
  • 2.Replace iron utensils with reproductions currently being sold by historic area stores. (The iron pieces presently in the Guard House are, for the most part, really, really bad.)
  • 3.Acquire some additional cooking utensils; we might be able to supply some from Collections providing they will be given proper care.
  • 4.Set the table as if it were being used--pipes, tobacco box, cards, paper and quills, eating utensils, pewter.
  • 5.Install more clothing. Again, see what the Costume Department can supply you with. It seems that at least some of the clothing could legitimately be civilian.
  • 6.Can you come up with an appropriate musical instrument or two? What about a fiddle?
  • 7.What is the historical basis for the awning currently being constructed?
  • 8.Hang out same laundry behind the Guard House.

GROUNDS

  • 1.Replace canvas covering artillery tubes.
  • 2.Are regular outside cooking activities legitimate? (Does the fact that the Magazine is in the middle of town bear upon grounds us-age?)
  • 3.There seems to be an excess of fencing and barrier ropes. Can some of it be removed without decreasing visitor control and safety?
  • 4.Is a wagon or cart available?

J. G.

1

ARCHAEOLOGICAL BRIEFING AND TESTING PLAN
BLOCK 12
POWDER MAGAZINE

Prepared for
The Magazine Interpretive Planning Team

July 9, 1985
Patricia Samford
Office of Excavation and Conservation

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents2
List of Figures3
Introduction4
Current Property Appearance4
Map Research4
Prior Archaeological Investigations9
Other Disturbances to the Property15
Archaeological Potential23
Bibliography27
Appendix A29
Appendix B (Testing Plan)30
3
Figure 1.Current Property Appearance5
2.Frenchman's Map (1761)6
3.Detail of Frenchman's Map7
4.Rochambeau Map8
5.Block 12 Archaeological Areas10
6.Excavation of Magazine Wall (1933)11
7.Block 12 Archaeological Features12
8.Block 12 Disturbances16
9.1650 Baptist Church19
10.Bell Hospital20
11.Tunnel Construction (1940/41)21
12.Area Impacted by Tunnel Construction22
13.Block 12 Archaeological Potential24
14.Block 12 Aerial View (1927)26
4

BLOCK 12 PUBLIC MAGAZINE

Introduction

This archaeological briefing and testing plan has been prepared for the Magazine Interpretive Planning Team. Its purpose is to analyze the property in terms of previous disturbances to archaeological resources, usually in the form of early archaeological investigations and post-colonial building episodes. The resources used in the preparation of this document included 18th and 19th century map information, Colonial Williamsburg research and archaeological reports, historic photographs, and archival material pertaining to the property.

Current Property Appearance

The Powder Magazine and its associated outbuildings are located in Market Square on Block 12. The property is bordered to the north by Duke of Gloucester Street, to the south by Francis Street, to the east by the Market Square Tavern property, and to the west by the Greenhow-Repiton property (Figure 1).

The Powder Magazine is an original building which has been restored through the efforts of the APVA and the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation. Archaeological investigations of the property have provided information for the reconstruction of the high brick wall enclosing the Magazine, and that of the guardhouse located to the southeast. A path leads from the door in the northern façade of the Magazine to Duke of Gloucester Street, with two sentry boxes flanking the path.

Map Research

Frenchman's Map The Frenchman's Map of 1781 shows three structures in association with the Powder Magazine. These are shown in Figures 2 and 3.

Rochambeau Map A Rochambeau Map from the late 18th century also shows three structures located to the east of the Powder Magazine (Figure 4).

5

RR125005 Figure 1. Current Property Appearance

6

RR125006 Figure 2. Frenchman's Map

7

RR125007 Figure 3. Detail of Frenchman's Map

8

RR125008 Figure 4. Rochambeau Map

9

Bucktrout Map: The Bucktrout Map, dating to the beginning of the 19th century, only shows the Magazine standing in the center of Market Square. This map, however, only showed major structures, and probably would not have included the ancillary buildings.

There are also numerous illustrations and photographs of the Magazine, dating from the 19th century to the present. These sources help document changes to the property over time. A list of these sources is provided in Appendix A.

Prior Archaeological Investigations

Archaeology was conducted in the vicinity of the Powder Magazine in 1933, 1934 and 1948 in Archaeological Areas B and C (Figure 5). These separate excavations will be described below.

In January of 1933, excavations at the Powder Magazine (Block 12, Archaeological Area B) had been completed under the direction of Herbert Ragland. Photographs of this excavation show trenching to expose the remnants of the wall which had surrounded the Magazine, but the remainder of the interior Magazine yard appears undisturbed (Figure 6). This wall was reconstructed in 1935. Archaeology indicated a brick path between the wall gate and the north entrance and no other paths were indicated in this enclosure (Kendrew 1935). The excavations also located a "modern" well just inside the Magazine wall, directly west of the northern entrance. This well was most likely associated with the Magazine's use as a livery stable.

A cache of over 300 cannonballs was located 10' south of the Magazine wall, and photographs suggest that portions of this feature were not excavated in 1933. James Knight, who worked on the project, remembers that part of the feature was left untouched, and is most likely still extant underground (Knight 1985). Apparently the cannonballs were presented to the APVA in April of 1936 in exchange for some other items (Goodwin 1936). T. R. Goodwin, in a letter to A.P.V.A. member Mrs. A. D. Jones, stated that he planned to clean the cannonballs in a concrete mixer.

After locating the wall surrounding the Magazine, further archaeological excavations were conducted in the latter part of 1934 in an attempt to locate the Guardhouse. The Frenchman's Map of 1781, depicting structures to the east of the Magazine was used to plan the areas excavated. Figure 7 shows archaeological features uncovered in this 10 RR125009 Figure 5
Block 12 Archaeological Areas
11 RR125010 Figure 6. Excavation of Magazine Wall (1933) 12 RR125011 Figure 7. Archaeological Features on Block 12 13 excavation in relation to information from the Frenchman's Map. The report for this excavation has not been located, but the map contains a sizeable text portion which describes the foundation located through the investigation. Three structures were located and these are described below.

Structure E

This structure, according to the archaeological map, was located near the existing ground surface. A date for its construction was given as the "colonial" period on the basis of the workmanship, shell mortar and Flemish bonding of the foundation. The structure measured 62'8" EW by 22'9" NS, with walls 1'1" in thickness and averaging four courses in depth. There were no photographs of the excavation of this structure, but most likely it was located through trenching. In this event, the builder's trenches for the building would probably be destroyed by the trenching, virtually eliminating any chance of dating the building's construction. Chances are good however, given the past experience of this department, that stratigraphic layers of fill are still present within the interior of the structure, and these may furnish some clues about dating the building's construction and demolition. Generally, after archaeological excavations were completed, structural foundations were re-covered with soil unless the building was going to be reconstructed. Therefore, it is highly likely that the foundations far Structure E are still in place.

Structure G

The 1934 excavations also revealed the brick foundations of a large (60' NS by 40' EW) structure to the northeast of the Magazine. About half of the brick foundation was still intact, with the western portion of the building discernible as a concentration of brickbats. Examination of the brickwork revealed that neither the bonding nor the mortar used were of "colonial character" (Campbell 1934a). Since no local residents had a recollection of this structure and a fully grown tree was growing over the north wall the archaeologists and architects concluded that the structure was built early in the 19th century. This was originally city property and in 1934 it was felt that this structure most likely represented a public building of some kind.

14

Structure H

Structure H represents the fragmentary foundations of a building interpreted as belonging to the "colonial period" (Campbell 1934a). The brick foundations of this structure were located at a depth below grade similar to that of the Magazine. The complete size of the structure could not be ascertained due to previous damage to the brick foundations. It was approximated that the structure measured 28'10" EW by 19'3" NS. Located in the general area shown to contain a building on the Frenchman's Map, the foundations were interpreted as the guardhouse.

The interior of the Magazine was also excavated during the 1934 work. In order to conduct these excavations, the cement floor, which had been installed by the APVA, was removed. The interior of an inner brick octagon was completely removed, but other areas inside were only excavated down to a brick paving. Also, three feet of fill along the south, west, and east walls of the Magazine were never disturbed. After these excavations were completed, a new concrete slab floor was installed (Moorehead 1946).

In 1948, Archaeological Area C was cross-trenched in a northeast to southwest direction. This cross-trenching located the foundations of another building, similar in form to the structure located in the 1934 excavations and identified as a guardhouse. The structure uncovered in 1948 was located east of the Powder Magazine, and south of the 1934 structure. Traces of another building, congruent with the Frenchman's Map were also uncovered in 1948. These are described below and can be seen on Figure 7.

Structure F

The 1948 excavations on Block 12 revealed the remains of a structure located slightly southeast of the Magazine. This is the building which has currently been reconstructed as the Magazine guardhouse. The structure had been partially robbed of its brick foundations, but it appeared that the building had been constructed in two stages, each during the "colonial" period (Knight 1948). Only the first period of construction has been reconstructed as the guardhouse.

15

Structure I

These probable structural remains were composed of an east-west running line of brick bats and shell mortar. Located approximately 1' below grade, they are seen in Figure 7 as located in an area shown to contain a structure on the Frenchman's Map. As with all the other structures located through archaeological excavation, there are no records of any artifacts provenienced to specific structures to aid in their dating.

Landscaping in connection with the construction of the guardhouse took place in 1948. This included grading, installation of gravel paths, removing an existing culvert and building a new culvert, and removal of a brick path (Jones 1948).

Colonial Parkway Tunnel Prior to the tunnel construction, money was appropriated for archaeological excavation along the tunnel corridor. Records suggest that the only area which was examined during this period was on the Skillman and Miller property on Block 28. There is no indication that any archaeological work was conducted on Block 12 in the vicinity of the Powder Magazine.

No archaeological work has been undertaken north, northwest, west, or southwest of the Magazine.

Other Disturbances to the Property

In addition to disturbances created through previous archaeology, later building episodes on Block 12, plus landscaping in connection with the Colonial Williamsburg restoration, must be taken into account. Following are descriptions of each of the structures which were known to have stood on Block 12 in the vicinity of the Powder Magazine. Their location and probable impact on archeological resources pertaining to the Magazine is examined (Figure 8).

Buildings 1 & 3 Building 1 was an eight room frame bungalow located on the north side of Francis Street, between South England and South Queen Streets. During the 1930s it was used by the Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company as a telephone exchange office. Correspondence dating 16 RR125012 Figure 8. Disturbances to Block 12 17 to the period when C&P occupied the building indicates that there were large amounts of cable laid in connection with the building's use as an exchange office (Lecky 1929). These quarters were vacated by the telephone company at the end of August, 1934 and wrecked within 21 days (Geddy 1934). Specifications for the wrecking of the building indicated that the brick foundations were to be removed. Building 3 was a garage associated with the telephone exchange.

Buildings 2 & 4 .The property where these buildings were located was the northeast intersection of Francis and England Streets, directly in the rear of the Bell Hospital. These structures were referred to as "Negro Shacks" in 1930, just prior to their wrecking (WHC 1930). Photographs of the structures shows that both were pier-supported and would have caused little damage to archaeological features in that area. Correspondence indicates that the two buildings were in very poor condition in 1930, with neither having electricity, heat or plumbing. Nevertheless, the houses continued to be occupied by black tenants up until the time they were demolished in December of 1930 (WHC, 11-26-30). These houses appear to have fronted on South England Street.

Building 14 Spencer and Dana Real Estate Office This two story frame structure was located east of the Stone Store (A&P). It rested on a brick foundation, and was wrecked in April of 1931.

Buildings 15 & 19 Stone Store The Stone Store, leased by the A & P as a grocery, was located east of the Baptist Church parsonage. This was a frame structure on a brick foundation, and associated with it was a small outbuilding, in poor condition according to a 1930 description of the property. Records seem to indicate that the store had been used by the A & P since around 1912 (Stone Store 1928-1934). The two buildings were demolished in 1934 (Memo 1934).

Buildings 16 & 18 Baptist Church The Baptist Church, located northeast of the magazine, was constructed in 1850. It is believed that the church was at least partially built with bricks salvaged from the wall surrounding the Magazine. When reconstruction of the wall was planned in the 1930s, a question was posed about whether the bricks in the basement of the church were from the original wall and if there would be enough there to rebuild the wall (WHC 1933). The old brick turned out to be non-useable, and new brick were fired. 18 The Williamsburg Holding Corporation bought the church in 1933, and it, along with the parsonage, was wrecked in July of 1934 (Todd and Brown 1934). Photographs of the church show that its appeared to have a half basement, which would incur damage to archaeological resources in that area (Figure 9).

Building 17 Williamsburg or Bell Hospital The Bell Hospital, located northwest of the, magazine was a 3 story brick building. This building was constructed in the 19th century, and was wrecked in November 1930 (Shurcliff 1930). Photographs show that the structure contained a basement, at least under the northern end of the building (Figure 10). A fence divided the hospital property from that of the Magazine (Geddy 1931). Records indicate that topsoil was hauled to the site of the Bell Hospital after its removal.

"Toot-an-kum-in" Garage This structure stood directly to the south of the Bell Hospital and can be seen on the 1921 Sanborn Map. Its foundations cut and damaged the brick enclosing wall of the Magazine.

Colonial Parkway The Colonial Parkway tunnel, constructed in 1940/41, passes directly through Block 12. Specifications called for the construction of a reinforced concrete tunnel .517 miles in length. The tunnel was to be built by the "cut and cover" method, involving the excavation of 110,700 cubic yards of earth (Tunnel 1937-39). Figure 11 shows the amount of soil disturbance which was involved with this construction. Topsoil was to be placed over the area disturbed by the tunnel, and landscaped to match the former grades. There is no archaeological potential for the area impacted by the tunnel (Figure 12).

19

RR125013 Figure 9. 1850 Baptist Church

20

RR125014 Figure 10. Bell Hospital

21

RR125015 Figure 11. Tunnel Construction 1940/41

22

RR125016 Figure 12
Area Disturbed by the Construction of the NPS Tunnel

23

Archaeological Potential

Figure 13 shows probable archaeological potential for Block 12, based on the background research covered in this report. Archaeological Area 12B was apparently only excavated in areas where the architects felt they would locate information on structural elements. Therefore, some substantial areas within B do not appear to have been disturbed at all, for example, the interior of the Magazine yard. Also, the outlines for the cannonball cache were not recorded in 1933, and there is a possibility that there may be a structure associated with this feature. These areas are marked in Figure 13 as having good archaeological potential for yielding information on activities around the Magazine.

Area 12C was cross-trenched and the coverage appears to have been fairly good, so no more brick foundations should be expected in this area. Archaeological cross-trenching consisted of placing 1' wide trenches spaced 5' to 6' apart at a 45 degree angle to the property and street lines. This insured that all structures with brick foundations would be located. Cross-trenching does not, however, destroy all valuable archaeological information. Subsequent archaeological investigations in this area could be used to locate traces left by impermanent types of structures, patterns of postholes associated with fence lines and refuse deposits on the property.

We can anticipate the remains of the huge 1850 Baptist Church in the northeast corner of the Magazine lot, and also the remains of the Bell Hospital in the area just north of the Magazine. Figure 14 shows both these structures, along with a number of other buildings west of the Magazine, which should have left archaeological traces and may have destroyed archaeological remains. The areas where the basements of the church and the hospital are expected have no archaeological potential, but the remainder of the structures on the lot are estimated to have left little or no damage to archaeological remains.

There is moderate archaeological potential for most of the structures which were investigated during the prior excavations. Excavation usually only uncovered the foundations of the buildings, and left interior fill virtually untouched. Therefore, reopening of these structures could furnish information on the function and dating of these buildings.

24

RR125017 Figure 13. Block 12 Archaeological Potential

25

The artifact collection from the previous excavations is apparently provenienced only to two very large areas. Data collected in this manner cannot be used to answer current research questions, so the artifact assemblage is of little use. However, we can probably assume that the over 300 cannonballs all came from the sealed cache and have some research value.

Appendix B is a proposal for a testing plan at the Powder Magazine. The testing is proposed in two parts, the first being an preliminary survey to see if landscaping on the property has removed all the 18th century cultural fill. The Phase II testing plan is designed to answer specific questions about the property which could aid in the interpretation of the Magazine.

RR125018 Figure 14. Block 12 Aerial View (1927)

26

Bibliography

Bucktrout, Benjamin
1800
Plan of the City of Williamsburg. Map on file, Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, Research Department Library.
Campbell, G. S.
1934a
Archaeological Survey of Foundations Surrounding the Magazine. Foundations in Block 12-12C.
1934b
Archaeological Survey of Foundations Inside the Magazine, 12B.
Frank, E. M.
1946
Magazine Guard House, Block 12, Building 9A, Architectural Report, Colonial Williamsburg Foundation.
Frenchman's
1781
Plan de la ville et environs de Williamsburg en Virginie, 1782. Map on file, Research Department Library, Colonial Williamsburg Foundation.
Geddy, V. M.
1934
Letter to J. F. Slaven dated August 1, 1934. In File on Block 12, Nos. 1 anal 3, Rents 1929-1934. Colonial Williamsburg Archives Department.
Goodwin, T. R.
1936
Letter to Mrs. Drewery Jones dated April 17, 1936. In File Block 12, No. 9 Powder Magazine 1935-1941. Colonial Williamsburg Archives Department.
Jones, I. L.
1948
Memo to K. Chorley from I. L. Jones dated December 23, 1948. In File Block 12, Nos. 9 and 9A, Powder Magazine and Guardhouse, Landscaping 1948. Colonial Williamsburg Archives.
Kendrew, A. E.
1935
Letter to Perry, Shaw and Hepburn dated July 19, 1935. In File Block 12, No. 9 Landscaping Powder Magazine 1935-1936. Colonial Williamsburg Archives Department. 27
Knight, James M.
1948
Archaeological Survey of Foundations of Powder Magazine Guard House, Williamsburg, Virginia, 12C.
1985
Personal communication.
Lecky, Robert
1929
Letter to Charles O. Heydt dated October 2, 1929. In File on Block 12, Nos. 1 and 3, Rents 1929-1934. Colonial Williamsburg Archives Department.
Memo
1934
Memo for files dated July 25, 1934. In File Block 12, Nos. 15 and 19, Stone Store 1928-1934. Colonial Williamsburg Archives Department.
Moorehead, S. P.
1946
Letter to Cleverdon, Varney and Pike dated September 30, 1946. In File Block 12, No. 9 Public Magazine 1942-1947.
Ragland, Herbert S.
1933
Archaeological Report on Excavations and Foundations around Colonial Powder Magazine. Report on file at Colonial Williamsburg Foundation.
Shurcliff, Arthur
1934
Preliminary Report on Powder Magazine Wall. Report on file at Colonial Williamsburg Foundation.
1935
Letter to Vernon M. Geddy dated July 26, 1935. In File Block 12, No. 9, Landscaping Powder Magazine 1935-1936. Colonial Williamsburg Archives Department.
Todd and Brown, Inc.
1934
Letter to Branch Bocock dated July 24, 1934. In File Block 12, Nos. 16 and 18, Baptist Church 1929-1934. Colonial Williamsburg Archives Department.
Tunnel
1937
File on Colonial National Monument-Tunnel, 1937-1939. Colonial Williamsburg Archives Department. 28
1940
File on Colonial National Monument-Tunnel, 1940. Colonial Williamsburg Archives Department.
1941
File on Colonial National Monument-Tunnel, 1941-1943. Colonial Williamsburg Archives Department.
WHC
1930
Williamsburg Holding Corporation. Letter to Perry, Shaw and Hepburn dated December 1, 1930. File On Block 12, Nos. 2 and 4, Goodwin 1929-1932. Colonial Williamsburg Archives Department.
1933
Williamsburg Holding Corporation. Letter to Perry, Shaw and Hepburn dated March 10, 1933. In File Block 12, No. 9 Landscaping Powder Magazine 1935-1936. Colonial Williamsburg Archives Department.
28
29

APPENDIX A

Illustrations

Lossing, Benson J.
1860
The Pictorial Field Book of the Revolution. New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers, Volume 2. p. 264.
Granston
Illustration of Magazine circa 1861-63.

Photographs

Listed by negative numbers and available at Research Library.

0-56-8526-21927 Aerial View
79-13291933 Aerial View
L-52519th c. view of magazine as livery stable
N498Powder Magazine
63-GR-172-2Powder Magazine
80-DS-1388View of Magazine from DOG St., 1905
30

APPENDIX B

Phase I Testing

Purpose: To determine the amount of grading which took place around the Magazine in 1933/34 and 1948 and see what impact this has had on soil stratigraphy and previously located structural remains.

Needed: Test units at predetermined locations around the Magazine (Show map with these locations pinpointed). This would be the equivalent of 7 2.5' square units.

This would call for two field technicians for a total of 7 days. The work accomplished in this time period would be the establishment of baselines from which the units could be plotted, the excavation, screening, and recording of the units. This also includes time for backfilling and interpretation to visitors.

Cost estimate:
2 Field Technicians for 7 days5.37 /hr.$715.71
1 Lab Technician for 5 days5.37/hr.$255.61
TOTAL$971.32
31

Phase II Testing

Purpose: If Phase I testing shows intact layers and structural remains on the property, a Phase II testing would be recommended. The purpose of this excavation would be to determine answers to questions posed by the Interpretive Planning Team. Following is a list of specific research questions with a testing strategy designed to provide answers to research questions.

1. Was there a pathway leading from Francis Street to the south side of the Magazine?

The best way to determine this would be to run a narrow trench (2.5' wide NS by 30' EW) to the south of the Magazine. This trench would locate evidence of pathways/roads leading to the south facade. Excavation of layers above and below the pathways would provide relative dating for the period of the pathway's use.

2. How much of the cannonball cache still exists, and was there a structure associated with it, as suggested by the box drain?

The solution to this would be to relocate the cache and open the west half in a 10' square unit to see if any structural remains (i.e. brick foundations or postholes) are associated with it. This may also necessitate opening a larger area around the cache. Answers to when the cannonballs were deposited is also possible through this excavation.

3. How was the interior yard of the Magazine used in the 18th century?

The interior yard of the Magazine has very good potential for archaeological remains, not only in the form of types of yard storage, but also potential activity areas within the yard (i.e. the presence of small fires used for cooking or making lead shot, pathways, etc.). This portion of the excavation will be complicated and slowed by the multiple series of fence lines which can be seen in late 19th and early 20th century photographs of the Magazine.

32

Photographs of the 1933 excavation of the Magazine wall suggest that the stratigraphic layers around the Magazine reach a depth of 1-2' below present grade. The chances of this area having been graded in connection with the 1933/34 work is small, so chances for 18th century stratigraphic layers remaining is very good. The interior yard can either be tested through the placement of several 10' square units within the yard, or if desired, a complete examination could be accomplished. There appears to be only one area, that of the former location of the "Toot-an-kum-in" Garage, that has been disturbed within the Magazine yard.

4. Can information be located on various activity areas in the vicinity of the Magazine?

Since late 18th century map references only show structures to the east of the Magazine, chances are good that this is the area where activities were occurring. I would suggest a series of shovel tests (1' diameter) spaced systematically, say, every 10'.. These shovel tests would be excavated and recorded according to soil layers. Analysis of artifact types, dates and quantities from each would be mapped, allowing concentration of artifacts to be plotted. These maps would then suggest where further testing could be done in order to further delineate activity areas.

5. When was the addition constructed on the west end of the guardhouse and what was the function of this space? Can the function and dating of structure H be determined?

Both of these questions can be answered by locating units along the foundation in order to expose what brickwork might remain. Through the location and excavation of builder's trenches, or possibly through related layers, indirect dating for the construction, use and destruction of these buildings might be determined. Placement of test units within the interior of the building foundations may also provide clues, through analysis of the types and dating of the artifacts found within, of the functions of the structures.

33
6. Can information on military foodways be determined?

Analysis could be conducted on faunal remains recovered in features or soil layers associated with the 18th century occupation of the Magazine. A good sample of data from other 18th century military establishments exists and could be used to compare the foodways of the Powder Magazine staff with military establishments along the Eastern Seaboard. The cost of this type of analysis would depend on the number of bones which were recovered through archaeological analysis and cannot be accurately estimated at this time.

7. What were the divisions of space which occurred on the Magazine property in the 18th century?

The location of fence lines and pathways, which would indicate the relationships between buildings and provide spatial divisions, is archaeologically recoverable. The strategy for locating these types of remains would be to place test units or small trenches on property lines or off of corners of buildings in order to locate fence lines. Pathways would be discerned by placing small (2.5' wide by 10' long) trenches. off of doorways, roads, and between flanking buildings.

34

BUDGET FOR PHASE II TESTING

1 Field Technician for 25 weeks5.95/hr.7080.50
5 Field Technicians for 13 weeks5.37/hr.16,614.78
1 Lab Technician for 25 weeks5.37/hr.6390.30
1 Lab Technician for 13 weeks5.37/hr.3322.96
Equipment500.00
Report Production900.00
TOTAL34,808.54
35

These are the types of questions which I though might be of importance to the Magazine Interpretive Planning Team. If there are any more questions that you think archaeology might play a part in answering, please let me know, and I will be glad to work up a testing plan and budget for them.

July 18, 1985
To: William E. White
From: Edward A. Chappell
Subject: Magazine Research Proposal

As discussed with your committee, I believe that about two months of useful research could be carried out concerning the architecture of the Magazine and associated buildings.

I see three principal parts in the research and report:

  • 1.Specific documentation on this building. I expect that new discoveries in this realm will be limited, but possible resources should be reviewed, and previously known data may be found to be more helpful in the light of new discoveries in the second category.
  • 2.Documentation and possibly physical evidence for analogous buildings in the English-speaking world. Obviously, such material will be far-flung, but it is reasonably likely that such material exists and that it could supply us with fresh perspectives on the Magazine's form and functions.
  • 3.Recommendations for changes to the restored building, its furnishings, and its interpretation. We have no way of knowing whether new research will lead to specific recommendations for changes to twentieth-century portions of the building, but this is a reasonable possibility. Further, it is very likely that new evidence will help us to more intelligently reconsider various options, especially for public interpretation.

Please let me know when our department can help further.

[initialed]
E. A. C.

Copies to:
R. C. Birney
N. A. Pappas

August 5, 1985
To: Bill White
From: Kevin Kelly
Subject: Historical Research Requirements for Reinterpreting the Public Magazine

Several areas of research interest have emerged from our planning committee discussions which relate both to immediate and long-range interpretive goals. I have grouped them below and have offered my assessment of the research requirements for each.

Questions Concerning Magazine Personnel

There exist a number of unanswered questions about who was actually involved with the Magazine. The guards assigned there during the French and Indian War protested their poverty, but were they in fact poor? If so, did they remain so? What was the status of the Keeper and Armourer of the Magazine? How did they fit within the colonial political order on the eve of the Revolution? These questions touch on the importance of the Magazine as a civic institution and on developing civilian attitudes toward the military. Information to answer many of these biographical questions has been collected already and can be found in the York County master files. They can be supplemented by data in the house histories, John Lowers training manual, and other Research Department files. The social order of eighteenth-century Williamsburg is being developed now by the phase two period of the York County Project and can provide a context in which to place the individual Magazine personnel. To answer all these questions requires first a series of tightly framed research queries. Once they are established it should take a full-time researcher three to six months to pull together the evidence, assess it, and write up the findings. However,much of this research could be accomplished by Magazine staff members working under the direction of a member of the Research Department. In that case the time necessary to complete the project would probably be six to twelve months.

Specific Questions About the Magazine as a Warehouse

Curatorial and architectural research on other eighteenth-century magazines and military warehouses should prove extremely useful in understanding how rooms in the Magazine were used and appeared with goods stored in them. However, it is unlikely that any new documentary evidence about this magazine as a storehouse will ever be uncovered. In fact, most of what can be known about what was stored there and how those goods were acquired and distributed 2 is being used in the interpretation of the Magazine now. The major exception to this understanding is the Magazine's supply role in Virginia's Revolutionary War efforts. What is needed concerning these research questions is not more time spent searching for new manuscript sources, but an essay that draws on existing evidence and that directly addresses this issue. Such a tightly focused research report would probably require three to six months to write. Again, this could best be accomplished by a Magazine staff member who is already familiar with the topic, assisted by an historian in the Research Department.

Specific Questions Concerning the Routine Daily Activities at the Magazine

Questions about routine activities such as whether the Magazine was open during specific hours of the day, who actually off-loaded supplies, and did the guards have additional duties cannot be answered because relevant evidence to answer such questions is rarely found. Most eighteenth-century individuals did not consider such routine events important enough to record. If such information is ever found, it will be by accident, or by architectural historians as they uncover evidence about other eighteenth-century magazines.

Questions Concerning the Military Supply Establishment of Late Eighteenth-Century Virginia

These questions go to the heart of the "Becoming Americans" storyline that is to be interpreted at this site. However, the history that would address these issues has not been written yet. In the absence of this history, much of the specific site interpretation at the Magazine will tend to float unconnected to larger issues. Furthermore, many statements made during any interim interpretive plan will have to be tentative and remain speculative until the necessary research on this topic is done. Writing an adequate military history of late colonial Virginia will be a major undertaking. From a quick glance at the records it does seem that a fair amount of evidence about Virginia's mobilization efforts during two wars (1754-65, 1775-83) does exist although the quality of the data is certainly open to question. For the Revolution, the Public Store Records, surviving correspondence between the governor and other state and continental officials as well as official state papers should make it possible to shed some light on the process of procurement and disbursement of military goods, on the relationship between the Public Armourer, the Keeper of the Magazine, and other supply officials, and on the general level of success of the state's mobilization effort. Evidence for similar questions about military supply during the French and Indian War may be found in British sources. Questions concerning military life--who the soldiers were, how they lived in the field--will probably prove time consuming to answer. For example, gathering material on the background of Virginia's provincial soldiers during the French and Indian War will require identifying soldiers on Muster Rolls whose home county records have survived and then searching through them for such scraps of biographical information that exist. Fortunately, the political history, which provides the proper context for the military history of late colonial Virginia has been treated in Richard Morton's older work, Colonial Virginia and is the main focus of John Selby's recent manuscript on Virginia during the Revolution.

3

In addition to providing the necessary background material to appropriately interpret the Magazine, a major study of Virginia's mobilization effort, especially during the Revolution, would make an important scholarly contribution. To date only a few studies have focused on the administrative aspect of colonial wars. Two recent works that demonstrate what could be done are Richard Buel's Dear Liberty, a case study of how the demands of the Revolutionary War wore down Connecticut's citizens and wrecked their economy, and E. Wayne Carp's To Starve the Army at Pleasure, which describes all the difficulties the Continental Congress had in supplying its army with food, clothing, and equipment. It is very likely that a research study of the scope proposed would require no less than two years to complete and would require the full-time services of an experienced military historian. Undoubtedly, outside funding will be needed to hire such an historian. A necessary first step to secure funding is to write a research grant proposal. Once given the go ahead it should be possible for you, John Hill, and I to draft one in three months time.

Finally, for planning purposes, the salary of a full-time historian, depending on background and experience, would be approximately $25,000 to $30,000 a year plus 19% for benefits.

[initialed]
K.P.K

May 31, 1985
To: E. A. Chappell
From: N. A. Pappas
Subject: Enclosure for Magazine Area

The present snake fence around the Magazine and Guardhouse is rapidly disintegrating. As we have discussed several times, it is totally undocumented and inaccurate for this location. Since the fence will have to be replaced in the near future, it seems obvious that the only documented enclosure be used - a Cheval-de-frise.

Would you please have someone research this and gather together whatever information there is regarding its appearance and construction? Bill White plans to write a CER for the work, so we will probably need a drawing for estimating purposes.

[initialed]
N. A. P.

Copy: W. E. White

November 21, 1985
To: Nicholas A. Pappas
From: Vanessa E. Patrick
Subject: Chevaux-de-frise at the Magazine

Your memo of May 31, 1985 concerning the removal of the Virginia rail fence at the Magazine and its replacement with chevaux-de-frise was relayed to me by Ed Chappell some time ago. I apologize for my lack of promptitude.

The attached drawing for chevaux-de-frise is a product of a new interpretive scheme developed for the Magazine in 1962-3. A small collection of illustrations and definitions, also attached, indicates that the drawing should be modified to express the protrusion of cross pieces from all sides of the horizontal member. Though no information about preferred wood types and preparation has been discovered, the suggestions appearing on the drawing are both historically and functionally reasonable.1

Though chevaux-de-frise represent a far more accurate and durable alternative than the present Virginia rail fence for enclosing the Magazine site, I must admit to a few reservations. Current research indicates that the activities which now take place in the immediate vicinity of the Magazine should be removed to an encampment situation elsewhere in town and fencing thus would not be needed.2 As this may not be currently possible, the existing interpretive pattern might be effectively served by rope barriers like those customarily used on Market Square. Such a frankly anachronistic means of enclosure should be considered with reference to the chevaux-de-frise option. The surrounding of the Magazine with chevaux-de-frise was the result of extraordinary circumstances, not the usual eighteenth-century treatment of the site.3 In the interest of safety, the crosspiece ends of the reconstructed chevaux remain blunt rather than pointed, a necessity which somewhat dilutes the structure's credibility.

Such are my thoughts about the chevaux-de-frise. No one will be more pleased than I to see the removal of the Virginia rail fence from the Magazine.

[initialed]
V. E. P.

Attachments
Copy to:
Edward A. Chappell

NOTES

^1. An analogy may be drawn with the selection of wood types for fence components. Oak was often used for ground-set posts due to its comparative durability and resistance to decay. Pine, characterized by tensile strength, was often used for rails. Fence components, especially rails and pales, were frequently split and sometimes drawn or otherwise shaped.
^2. Discussion with Magazine interpreters, September 18, 1985. Interpreters also explained that the sections of chevaux-de-frise, apparently built in the mid-1970's, had recently been dismantled due to decay. A new section has since materialized near the guardhouse. For origins of the 1970's constructions see memo from VEP to Edward A. Chappell, "Fences at the Magazine," February 24, 1983.
^3. The war-time appearance of the chevaux at the Magazine was recorded by Ebenzer Hazard, "Journal of Journeys to the South, 1777-78," in Jane Carson, We Were There. Descriptions of Williamsburg 1699-1859 (CWF: 1965), p. 39:
"The Magazine in Williamsburgh...is a small, circular, Brick Building; it is at present surrounded with Chevaux de Frize, made by Col. Bullit.-" (1777).

O. E. D.: Cheval de frise; usually p1. Chevaux de frise [Fr. lit. "horse of Friseland"(Netherlands) first used by cavalry-poor Frisians in struggle for freedom, second half of the seventeenth century].

  • 1.A defensive appliance of war, employed chiefly to check cavalry charges, and stop breaches.
  • 2.A line of spikes or nails similarly fixed along the top of a railing, paling or wall.

DICTIONARIUM ANGLO-BRITTANNICUM OR A GENERAL ENGLISH DICTIONARY. John Kersey, 1708 (in O.E.D.): "Chevaux de Frise are large Joists, or pieces of Timber, Ten or Twelve Foot in length, with Six Sides into which are driven a great Number of wooden Pins above Six foot long, crossing one another, and having their Ends armed with Iron Points."
KNIGHT'S AMERICAN MECHANICAL DICTIONARY. New York: 1874, vol. I: cheval-de-frise: "A bar traversed by rows of pointed stakes, and used to barricade an approach or close a breach. Called a Friseland horse because first used at the siege of Groningen, in that province, in 1658."

RR125019 Plate 79 - The Art of War VIII

RR125020 Chapter V - Weapons, Implements, and Fortifications